Bunnies and Stewardesses: Fall TV’s Racy Slant

With "The Playboy Club" and "Pan Am," skin is in (John Russo/NBC, Bob D'Amico/ABC)With "The Playboy Club" and "Pan Am," skin is in (John Russo/NBC, Bob D'Amico/ABC)(TheWrap) — Here's some good news about the upcoming fall TV season: There will be a marked increase in the number of actresses populating new series!

Now, the other news: They appear to have packed pretty light when it comes to wardrobe.

From the tight uniforms sported by the stewardesses on ABC's "Pan Am" and the Alphabet Network's sexy re-commissioned "Charlie's Angels" crime-fighters, to the fluffy-tailed servers of NBC's "The Playboy Club," the fashion trend of the season appears to be flesh, and plenty of it.

Call it the resurgence of Jiggle TV, a titillating genre that briefly blossomed in the 1970s with the original "Charlie's Angels," before giving way with the exit of "Baywatch."

[Related: Is 'The Playboy Club' Just 'Mad Men' With Boobs?]

Though none of the series have yet to debut, the trend of new shows featuring female leads in little clothing and subservient positions has already been met with criticism.

Gloria Steinem, who gained notoriety by going undercover as a bunny at the Playboy Club in New York in 1960s and writing an exposé about the working conditions, has said that she's hoping for a boycott of NBC's "The Playboy Club," claiming, "It normalizes a passive-dominant idea of gender. So, it normalizes prostitution and male dominance."

Christine Baranski, co-star of "The Good Wife," has similarly chimed in, telling New York magazine, "I'm rather appalled that they're now making television shows about Playboy bunnies and stewardesses... I think, 'Really? Haven't we gone past that, well past that?'"

[Related: ABC Attacked by 'DWTS' Fans Over Chaz Bono Casting]

Apparently not. But why now, in particular, does there seem to be a resurgence in flesh-centric TV fare?

Certainly, AMC's "Mad Men" seems to have loosened the jar lid with its highly successful exercise in flesh-friendly, misogyny-laced nostalgia.

And it might be no coincidence that the upcoming series — like "Mad Men" — all have retro elements to them. ("The Playboy Club" and "Pan Am" are both set in the 1960s, while "Charlie's Angels" is a revamp of a 1970s Jiggle TV progenitor.)

Martha M. Lauzen, Ph.D., the executive director for Center for the Study of Women in Television and Film, suggests that, particularly in dour financial times, male viewers — not to mention the overwhelmingly male decision-makers at the networks — might be looking to retreat into less complicated, more comforting times.

[Related: Anne Hathaway May Board Tom Hooper's "Les Miserables"]

"In times of economic and social upheaval and difficulty, nostalgia and a longing for an era when life seemed simpler tend to bloom," Lauzen said.

That could be especially true in an era when men — at least the ones not on TV, anyway — find themselves losing economic and social ground to the fairer sex.

"As women continue to gain economic, social and political power, there is always some sort of backlash, a desire to put women 'back in their place,'" Lauzen adds. "These programs may reflect that type of wishful thinking."

Naturally, those involved with the series have a different take on the matter. At the Television Critics' Association press tour earlier this month, "Pan Am" star Christina Ricci dismissed cries of sexism, claiming that her series provides "a really great message for young girls and women... [Air travel] is something that's exciting for these women. We're as excited as the passengers are."

Never mind that the Pan Am stewardesses were subjected to mandatory girdle-wearing and weigh-ins. Or that the trailer for the series prominently features a clip of one of the stewardesses stripped down to her bra as she frantically changes clothes in the back of a taxi.

Get a sneak peek at "Pan Am" right here:

Similarly, Amber Heard, who portrays Maureen on "The Playboy Club," praised the original Playboy Bunnies as pioneers of women's lib.

"[They] wanted their own fortune and they went out into the work force doing what they wanted to do," she told E! Online. "I could not be more empowered by that example, and I think denying women their sexuality is just as chauvinistic, if not worse."

[Related: Courtney Thorne-Smith Returning to 'Two and a Half Men']

A lofty sentiment — but one that might fall, um, flat when it comes wrapped in a skin-tight, cleavage-baring Playboy Bunny outfit.

Whether "The Playboy Club" and its ilk serve as crass exploitation or lessons in empowerment wrapped in an attractive package, Lauzen said that there will probably be more of the same coming, particularly if the current trend toward fewer women behind the scenes continues.

"The percentage of women working as writers on broadcast programs plummeted last season, declining from 29% in 2009-2010 to 15% in 2010-2011," she said. "The industry remains mostly male, and these programs may reflect the behind-the-scenes gender ratios."

Looking at the credits for the shows in question, Lauzen noted, "many of the important behind-the-scenes roles on these shows are filled by males."

Indeed, Drew Barrymore's executive-producer role on "Charlie's Angels" stands as a prominent exception to the general rule — along with Nancy Ganis, a former Pan Am stewardess who serves as an executive producer of "Pan Am."

ABC declined to comment to TheWrap for this story, while NBC and its series producers did not provide comment before publication.

So can viewers look forward to — or look askance at, depending on the perspective — reboots of "Three's Company," "The Love Boat" and other jiggle-TV mainstays of yore?

Maybe. But if the new crop of plots and character development end up as skimpy as the outfits, audiences just might decide to bounce elsewhere.

More from TheWrap.com:

 

1,193 comments

  • chieftain  •  8 months ago
    Could it be time for me to cancel my subscription to Bend Broadband and buy more books?
    • DaveK 8 months ago
      I don't understand why this comment has so many thumbs-down. It is probably one of the smartest, most hope inspiring things I have read tonight. Thank you.
  • Al 184  •  8 months ago
    So somebody watched "Catch Me if You Can" and said, "hey! Let's make a show out of this one small part I saw about the stewardess and junk.." Way to dig deep ABC!
    • Chris M. 8 months ago
      Well said! You nailed them with that one.
    • LR 8 months ago
      i had that same thought. the video clip in the article is the stupidest thing i have seen today. hopefully will be the stupidest thing. many people regardless of gender will agree no doubt, especially those i know who work/have worked in the airline industry.
    • SuckYou 8 months ago
      there is no box clearly with abc lol...what nincumpoops
  • Michelle  •  8 months ago
    Really? Blame the economy? Blame the folks that make them if you have to blame someone... If it ain't available.... Nobody watches it. Quit trying to blame circumstances for everything. Rise above people!
  • WILLIAM HULL  •  8 months ago
    lets see who makes it and who don't , looking forward to the new season with dancin with the stars
    • Buddah 8 months ago
      You mean dancing with the pigs
    • Ken 8 months ago
      go dance with your rosie palm
    • Richard S 8 months ago
      Should be called "Dancing with the has-beens and wanna-be's".
  • MICHAEL S  •  8 months ago
    It's a sad waste in the world of entertainment.
    • jk90 8 months ago
      I agree, but not for any "racy" content.
  • missy  •  8 months ago
    How is Pan Am too racy? I think the ladies are classy and look nice.
  • Emily  •  8 months ago
    Just another good reason why I haven't wasted any of my money on stupid TV for years. Get your butt off the couch and do something productive!
  • Maribel R  •  8 months ago
    just another factor in consumerism.
  • Anorexic Sumo  •  8 months ago
    so, we attack the people producing it, attack the people watching it, attack the people with the potential to watch it, now onto the actresses that make the whole thing go, right? They are real women that are choosing, for money, to do all these things you people are acusing the network of doing. They are, after all, the ones stripping on camera for money.
  • hfree  •  8 months ago
    Just what we need more junk on that mind numbing box...
  • VegasFriend  •  8 months ago
    The author of this article is male and wants us to believe that he's excited about opportunities for actresses in television and has nothing but concern for seeing those same actresses nearly nude? What has the USA done to its men?
  • Ult Critic  •  8 months ago
    Thank goodness. About time.
  • ItchyTriggerFinger  •  8 months ago
    No one was bitching about "Sex and The City", a show about 3 whores and their mom. From what I gathered while channel surfing, that show consisted of women sleeping around trying to land a man who could afford their shoes. Yet all I ever heard was how "hip" and "progressive" that junk was.

    Hot cup of Double Standards, anyone?
  • Billytrucks  •  8 months ago
    less television and more time outdoors, work or play, at least something is getting done!
  • CJWilliamson  •  8 months ago
    better looking male actors in both tv and movies, requiring the good looking men to have full nudity in thier contracts with a glance of thier glans (comparable to our nipple shots) would help so much. its not the sex women get annoyed with....it is the way it is so uneven. do you see the disgusting slobs WE have to look at!?!?
  • MJ  •  8 months ago
    Question. If all the women represented on these shows were plus sized, would it be demeaning or empowering? And why say that the show is demeaning and will fail simply because the women are scantily clad? Is it b/c SATC was such a huge failure?
  • ylmm  •  8 months ago
    "racy" or "risque"-NETWORK TV??? LMAO!!!!!
  • johnny appleseed  •  8 months ago
    Haven't seen these shows yet, but if the writing isn't there, then might as well cancel them now, and bring back shows like the Event, V, and Flash Forward...
  • Gary  •  8 months ago
    Lets hope these series herald a reversion of women to their more traditional rolls. Tired of seeing testosterone-charged d*yk*es and wanna'-be dudes wherever I go.
  • D.A.  •  8 months ago
    Lighten up, it's just enterntainment.

YAHOO! TV ON FACEBOOK

LATEST FALL TV BLOG POSTS

FIND YOUR NEW FAVORITE SHOWS!

By Network

Printable Calendar