YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Bill Maher's Crazy Stupid Politics

    Ratings Winners and Losers: Why Are ‘Good’ Shows Canceled and ‘Bad’ Shows Renewed?

    Nielsen Ratings and Idol

    Sometimes a show seems like the best thing since sliced bread, until you find out you're the only one watching it. You go online and find that the show is being torn apart, and may even be hated by many more people than those who love it. Perhaps it has already been canceled. How can this be? How is it that a show you love can be considered so horrible, when you never liked any of the shows to which it may be compared?

    Sometimes a characteristic of a show will be its biggest virtue to some people, and its biggest downfall to others. Usually it is the unconventional characteristics of a show that causes it to lose in the ratings, even if that is what makes it so fun to watch. There are shows in every genre that are adored by many, but somehow fall through the cracks to end up at the bottom of the ratings heap.

    Character personalities

    Shows that are considered ratings winners typically have likable characters that seem like people you may know in real life. Ratings winners such as "NCIS" and "New Girl" have mostly likable characters that are quirky enough to make the show different from other shows in the same genre.

    Some shows take a different route, and become ratings losers because of it, despite a rabid following of fans. For example, "Stargate Universe" had a crew of mostly unlikable characters. Many fans felt the odd and disagreeable ensemble was exactly what made the show interesting.

    Unconventional acting

    Sometimes a show may be considered by many to have horrible acting, while others may feel it is spot on. This is most common with shows such as "Sanctuary," where many fans get the sense that the acting is perfect for the campy nature of the show, while others who "don't get it" may think the acting is horrible.

    Story arcs

    "Stargate Universe" was a perfect example of a show that had a long-reaching story arc. It was impossible to watch an episode and understand what was going on without seeing all of the episodes before it. Part of the reason people stopped watching was probably because it was too difficult to keep up with the story after missing even one episode.

    Most sitcoms tend to be episodic, and therefore have a better chance in this arena. Shows such as "How I Met Your Mother," "The Office," and "2 Broke Girls," offer up minimal story arcs, but are almost completely episodic. You can start watching any episode and enjoy the laughs they have to offer. In many cases, you can jump into the middle of a single episode and still enjoy the jokes. A few references may be lost on you, but you will still get the gist enough to know when something is funny.

    Shows such as "Grimm" and "Person of Interest" try to walk a middle line. They have enough of a story arc to keep the fans interested, but you can still start watching the show at any point and pick up the plot well enough to become a fan. It can be a bit annoying for the biggest fans of these shows, but it is a smart move to avoid alienating viewers who miss an episode. It also gives the shows a chance to capture new fans.

     

    14 comments

    • tookiespookies  •  Texarkana, Texas  •  8 days ago
      I like the British version of Being Human. The characters are funny and seem likable. I can't seem to get into the American version of Being Human. It's blah, and the acting seems dry. What I find unique about the British shows is the fact that a lot of their actors went to college for acting in the first place. Almost the entire cast of Spartacus is educated in Theater. Yet at the end of the we all like different things. Take my book The Alien Recruitment for example..It does really well in the UK, but not in the US. It's because we all have a difference in taste. I think the UK likes Science Fiction more than the US.

      As for Stargate Universe the main problem was the lack of aliens in season one . While I liked Stargate Universe I felt it dealt too much with the characters and their past problems. In season two it started to get better, but by then it was too late.
    • TheReaper  •  Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania  •  10 days ago
      I've often wondered this myself. Why do good shows get canceled yet crap shows stay on, and on, and on, and on. For example, I watched "The Cape" every single week-it quickly became my favorite show-and then all of a sudden I go to turn it on and it's not on. Another show that I watched-this was back in I believe the early 90s-was called "The 100 Lives of Black Jack Savage". This show revolved around a pirate who killed 100 people before he lost his own life in a hangman's noose, he had a castle which was located in Key West, Florida; a young man buys the castle in order to get away from the rat race to work on a book he's writing, after buying the castle he encounters the spirit of Black Jack Savage and the spirit tells him that he cannot rest until he saves 100 lives to atone for the lives that he took when he was living; the show ended with 98 more lives to go.

      If you ask me, I think that all these idiotic reality shows should be canceled and never brought back. I mean I watched one episode of I think it was survivor-I can't even keep all of them straight anymore-and it was one of the worst instances of television that I have ever seen. It seems to me that no one realizes that every aspect of this so-called reality TV is scripted and everything follows a predetermined path: The first episode introduces the "cast of characters", the episodes following that show them going through their scripted drama and disagreements and so on and so forth and then finally you have the ending where everything seems to work out. Then they just wait until next season and come back and do the same thing all over again with a different cast of characters.

      Just cancel all reality TV and start showing good shows again like sitcoms that are actually funny unlike the crap that's on TV now.
    • Peter M  •  South Haven, Michigan  •  1 month 0 days ago
      In this day and age of DVR and Internet streaming there really is no reason why people can't catch up. The problem come when the Networks fail to take these sources into their rating, thus why shows get canceled even though they have huge followings.
    • Erma  •  Rochester, Minnesota  •  16 days ago
      When is "Bone's" coming back on?
    • beau10  •  16 days ago
      I have given up on idiotic TV crappola and discovered a really new delight - books.
    • lfp711  •  Buffalo, New York  •  20 days ago
      they switch the shows from mon to thurs /d ifferent times/ dont say when theyre on/ always repeating them i can watch it it 2 times but 4 or 5 ill change channel
    • Jacob  •  29 days ago
      It's because people would rather watch a pointless sitcom to get a few laughs than watch a serious, sophisticated show.
    • diane dickerson  •  Columbia, Maryland  •  27 days ago
      I still don't understand why they took off "LIE TO ME" ,that was one of the most well written and well acted show! It had good story lines, great actors and was just genuinely a great show! Instead Fox puts on some of the most non-watchable shows that I refuse to watch. Come on Fox, you have some intelligent viewers who have a taste for good shows that don't have to do with supernatural stuff andall that animated crap. I wonder if you even listen to you fans?
    • Alison  •  Auckland, New Zealand  •  1 month 0 days ago
      I know of a Auzzie show that was canceled after five years. The ranks were excellent geting over 1.5M aussies a week to watch the show alone and was in the top ten watch show each week for five years till it was canceled. I don't watch much TV today cause of repeats and i've seen them a dozen times. And the good ones only shown two or three times.
    • chimera  •  28 days ago
      And isn't there another factor involved here...procedural tstories vs character driven shows?
      Imho, the most sucessful series, the ones that get the big ratings networks love (..it is after all not about art, but numbers...), are those that can tread that fine line between the two types of show.
      IE, Bones, The Mentalist, some CSI, manage to satisfy the procedural and the character lovers. When those shows stray to far in one or the other direction fans complain: "it's too scientify" or "it's too much a soap opera".
      Person of Interest so far has found the golden middle...
    • henry  •  Corpus Christi, Texas  •  28 days ago
      I'm still puzzled why "Angel" was cancelled. The best show on the air of its final season.
    • Michał  •  Warsaw, Poland  •  1 month 0 days ago
      I believe everything that was said in this article was valid to some degree. However personally I think there are many more reasons out there. A popular expample to think on: Why SyFy (SyFail these days) claims to get better ratings with wrestling or cooking shows, than actual Science-Fiction productions which it was originally designed to air? Now seriously... What is so appealing about watching meaningless TV? Or is it just something people do... I mean get in front of the TV and cycle through channels until they find the dumbest thing on air and sit there like zombies (thoughtless, without any emotion)...
    • Arkansas shawn  •  Fayetteville, Arkansas  •  1 month 0 days ago
      this article is complete #$%$..
    • Lukus  •  Newark, New Jersey  •  29 days ago
      Firefly, Journeyman, Kyle XY.... FTW